The Closed-Door Battle to Become IOC President
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
In perhaps the quirkiest election in sports, seven officials are vying for the powerful position of president of the International Olympic Committee.
By Tariq Panja
Tariq Panja reported from London and Lausanne, Switzerland, on the curious process that will end with the election of the most powerful leader in international sports
Late Wednesday night, members of the International Olympic Committee gathered for a dinner at the Olympic Museum on the banks of Lake Geneva. The next morning, they would see presentations from seven candidates vying to be their leader, a role that would by most measures be the most important in international sports.
At the closed-doors gathering, the outgoing president, Thomas Bach, ensured that the members present — the people who determine who will eventually lead the I.O.C. — were kept apart from the candidates. It was, he said perhaps jokingly, so they could enjoy their meals in peace.
It was a scene in keeping with the quirky and sometimes stifling rules of an election that will be decided when I.O.C. members vote in March at a resort in southern Greece.
The winner will assume leadership of the organization that controls the Olympics, an event that is as prestigious as it is expensive, and a diplomatic status higher than any other figure in the sports world. But many of the candidates have been critical of the thicket of rules and regulations surrounding the election that they say have hindered their ability to get their message across not only to I.O.C. members but also the wider world.
Candidates are barred from holding debates, voicing opposition regarding a rival’s vision for the I.O.C. or even receiving public endorsements from members.
Image